↓ Skip to main content

Inotropic agents and vasodilator strategies for the treatment of cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
42 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inotropic agents and vasodilator strategies for the treatment of cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009669.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Konstantin Uhlig, Ljupcho Efremov, Jörn Tongers, Stefan Frantz, Rafael Mikolajczyk, Daniel Sedding, Julia Schumann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 230 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 8%
Student > Master 18 8%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 7%
Other 16 7%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 103 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 2%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 114 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,443,387
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,112
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,772
of 441,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#71
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.