You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Image guided surgery for the resection of brain tumours
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009685.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Damiano Giuseppe Barone, Theresa A Lawrie, Michael G Hart |
| Abstract |
Extent of resection is believed to be a key prognostic factor in neuro-oncology. Image guided surgery uses a variety of tools or technologies to help achieve this goal. It is not clear whether any of these, sometimes very expensive, tools (or their combination) should be recommended as part of standard care for patient with brain tumours. We set out to determine if image guided surgery offers any advantage in terms of extent of resection over surgery without any image guidance and if any one tool or technology was more effective. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Norway | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 432 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 421 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 56 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 13% |
| Researcher | 50 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 12% |
| Other | 27 | 6% |
| Other | 87 | 20% |
| Unknown | 107 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 166 | 38% |
| Neuroscience | 25 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 5% |
| Psychology | 15 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 58 | 13% |
| Unknown | 131 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,920,072
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,098
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,582
of 323,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#88
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.