You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Protocol‐directed sedation versus non‐protocol‐directed sedation to reduce duration of mechanical ventilation in mechanically ventilated intensive care patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009771.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leanne M Aitken, Tracey Bucknall, Bridie Kent, Marion Mitchell, Elizabeth Burmeister, Samantha J Keogh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 18% |
| Chile | 1 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 149 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 11% |
| Researcher | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 20% |
| Unknown | 36 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 16% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 38 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,360,165
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,655
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,410
of 359,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#170
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.