You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Femoral nerve blocks for acute postoperative pain after knee replacement surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009941.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ee‐Yuee Chan, Marlene Fransen, David A Parker, Pryseley N Assam, Nelson Chua |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 412 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 410 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 70 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 9% |
| Researcher | 36 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 36 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 8% |
| Other | 104 | 25% |
| Unknown | 94 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 206 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 2% |
| Psychology | 9 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 38 | 9% |
| Unknown | 107 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,528,733
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,834
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,520
of 244,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#197
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.