↓ Skip to main content

Exercise training undertaken by people within 12 months of lung resection for non‐small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
311 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exercise training undertaken by people within 12 months of lung resection for non‐small cell lung cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009955.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vinicius Cavalheri, Fatim Tahirah, Mika L Nonoyama, Sue Jenkins, Kylie Hill

Abstract

Decreased exercise capacity and impairments in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are common in people following lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Exercise training has been demonstrated to confer gains in exercise capacity and HRQoL for people with a range of chronic conditions, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure, as well as in people with cancers such as prostate and breast cancer. A programme of exercise training for people following lung resection for NSCLC may confer important gains in these outcomes. To date, evidence of its efficacy in this population is unclear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 311 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 306 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 21%
Researcher 38 12%
Student > Bachelor 36 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 10%
Other 16 5%
Other 46 15%
Unknown 78 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 16%
Psychology 20 6%
Sports and Recreations 17 5%
Social Sciences 14 5%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 88 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,296,727
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,927
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,373
of 210,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#196
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.