You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Preoperative physical therapy for elective cardiac surgery patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010118.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erik HJ Hulzebos, Yolba Smit, Paul PJM Helders, Nico LU van Meeteren |
| Abstract |
After cardiac surgery, physical therapy is a routine procedure delivered with the aim of preventing postoperative pulmonary complications. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 17% |
| Canada | 5 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 14% |
| Spain | 4 | 11% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 69% |
| Scientists | 5 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 522 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 510 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 79 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 64 | 12% |
| Researcher | 39 | 7% |
| Other | 35 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 6% |
| Other | 114 | 22% |
| Unknown | 158 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 180 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 87 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 49 | 9% |
| Unknown | 171 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,408,277
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,016
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,512
of 192,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.