↓ Skip to main content

Integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) strategy for children under five

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
38 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1083 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) strategy for children under five
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010123.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tarun Gera, Dheeraj Shah, Paul Garner, Marty Richardson, Harshpal S Sachdev

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,083 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 1080 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 204 19%
Researcher 123 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 100 9%
Student > Bachelor 81 7%
Student > Postgraduate 60 6%
Other 188 17%
Unknown 327 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 279 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 190 18%
Social Sciences 59 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 25 2%
Psychology 24 2%
Other 131 12%
Unknown 375 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#555,587
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#983
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,081
of 368,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.