You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical assessment to screen for the detection of oral cavity cancer and potentially malignant disorders in apparently healthy adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010173.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tanya Walsh, Joseph LY Liu, Paul Brocklehurst, Anne‐Marie Glenny, Mark Lingen, Alexander R Kerr, Graham Ogden, Saman Warnakulasuriya, Crispian Scully |
| Abstract |
The early detection and excision of potentially malignant disorders (PMD) of the lip and oral cavity that require intervention may reduce malignant transformations (though will not totally eliminate malignancy occurring), or if malignancy is detected during surveillance, there is some evidence that appropriate treatment may improve survival rates. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 29% |
| United States | 5 | 9% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Malta | 1 | 2% |
| Nepal | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 34% |
| Scientists | 7 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 333 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 57 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 11% |
| Researcher | 27 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 63 | 18% |
| Unknown | 93 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 145 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 5% |
| Psychology | 9 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 36 | 11% |
| Unknown | 106 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2017.
All research outputs
#872,369
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,698
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,862
of 316,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.