You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pre‐hospital versus in‐hospital thrombolysis for ST‐elevation myocardial infarction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010191.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael McCaul, Andrit Lourens, Tamara Kredo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 2 | 20% |
| Spain | 2 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 40% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 248 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 14% |
| Researcher | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 16% |
| Unknown | 74 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 10% |
| Unknown | 85 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,274,809
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,673
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,304
of 253,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#81
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.