You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fetal assessment methods for improving neonatal and maternal outcomes in preterm prelabour rupture of membranes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010209.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gemma C Sharp, Sarah J Stock, Jane E Norman |
| Abstract |
Fetal assessment following preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM) may result in earlier delivery due to earlier detection of fetal compromise. However, early delivery may not always be in the fetal or maternal interest, and the effectiveness of different fetal assessment methods in improving neonatal and maternal outcomes is uncertain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 186 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Researcher | 17 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 41 | 22% |
| Unknown | 55 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 11% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 63 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,165,353
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,503
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,430
of 266,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#79
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.