↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for the reduction of prescribed opioid use in chronic non‐cancer pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for the reduction of prescribed opioid use in chronic non‐cancer pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010323.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jude Windmill, Emma Fisher, Christopher Eccleston, Sheena Derry, Cathy Stannard, Roger Knaggs, R Andrew Moore

Abstract

Patients with chronic non-cancer pain who are prescribed and are taking opioids can have a history of long term high dose opioid use without effective pain relief. In those without good pain relief, reduction of prescribed opioid dose may be the desired and shared goal of both patient and clinician. Simple unsupervised reduction of opioid use is clinically challenging, and very difficult to achieve and maintain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 139 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 18%
Student > Master 22 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 25 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 45%
Psychology 18 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 26 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,221,406
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,554
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,464
of 212,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.