You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions to improve hearing aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010342.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiona Barker, Emma Mackenzie, Lynette Elliott, Simon Jones, Simon de Lusignan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 31% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 15% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 325 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 51 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 13% |
| Researcher | 38 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 55 | 17% |
| Unknown | 97 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 53 | 16% |
| Psychology | 24 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 52 | 16% |
| Unknown | 104 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,592,300
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,389
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,987
of 355,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.