↓ Skip to main content

Treatment for cryoglobulinemic and non‐cryoglobulinemic peripheral neuropathy associated with hepatitis C virus infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment for cryoglobulinemic and non‐cryoglobulinemic peripheral neuropathy associated with hepatitis C virus infection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010404.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim J Benstead, Colin H Chalk, Natalie E Parks

Abstract

Peripheral neuropathy is the most common neurologic complication of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The pathophysiology of the neuropathy associated with HCV is not definitively known; however, proposed mechanisms include cryoglobulin deposition in the vasa nervorum and HCV-mediated vasculitis. The optimal treatment for HCV-related peripheral neuropathy has not been established.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 2%
Unknown 121 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 12%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 42 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 45 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2016.
All research outputs
#6,959,709
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,078
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,795
of 360,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#192
of 260 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 260 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.