You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Diaries for recovery from critical illness
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010468.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amanda J Ullman, Leanne M Aitken, Janice Rattray, Justin Kenardy, Robyne Le Brocque, Stephen MacGillivray, Alastair M Hull |
Abstract |
During intensive care unit (ICU) admission, patients experience extreme physical and psychological stressors, including the abnormal ICU environment. These experiences impact on a patient's recovery from critical illness and may result in both physical and psychological disorders. One strategy that has been developed and implemented by clinical staff to treat the psychological distress prevalent in ICU survivors is the use of patient diaries. These provide a background to the cause of the patient's ICU admission and an ongoing narrative outlining day-to-day activities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 33% |
Australia | 2 | 11% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
Japan | 1 | 6% |
Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
Spain | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 28% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 311 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 47 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 36 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 9% |
Researcher | 25 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 7% |
Other | 48 | 15% |
Unknown | 106 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 60 | 19% |
Psychology | 34 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 1% |
Other | 20 | 6% |
Unknown | 114 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,555,656
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,166
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,943
of 369,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#123
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.