↓ Skip to main content

Diaries for recovery from critical illness

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
314 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diaries for recovery from critical illness
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010468.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda J Ullman, Leanne M Aitken, Janice Rattray, Justin Kenardy, Robyne Le Brocque, Stephen MacGillivray, Alastair M Hull

Abstract

During intensive care unit (ICU) admission, patients experience extreme physical and psychological stressors, including the abnormal ICU environment. These experiences impact on a patient's recovery from critical illness and may result in both physical and psychological disorders. One strategy that has been developed and implemented by clinical staff to treat the psychological distress prevalent in ICU survivors is the use of patient diaries. These provide a background to the cause of the patient's ICU admission and an ongoing narrative outlining day-to-day activities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 311 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 15%
Student > Bachelor 36 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 9%
Researcher 25 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 7%
Other 48 15%
Unknown 106 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 60 19%
Psychology 34 11%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 1%
Other 20 6%
Unknown 114 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,555,656
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,166
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,943
of 369,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#123
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.