You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long‐term health conditions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010523.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Angela Coulter, Vikki A Entwistle, Abi Eccles, Sara Ryan, Sasha Shepperd, Rafael Perera |
Abstract |
Personalised care planning is a collaborative process used in chronic condition management in which patients and clinicians identify and discuss problems caused by or related to the patient's condition, and develop a plan for tackling these. In essence it is a conversation, or series of conversations, in which they jointly agree goals and actions for managing the patient's condition. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 183 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 60 | 33% |
Spain | 12 | 7% |
Australia | 11 | 6% |
United States | 6 | 3% |
Canada | 6 | 3% |
Switzerland | 3 | 2% |
New Zealand | 3 | 2% |
Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Other | 9 | 5% |
Unknown | 70 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 114 | 62% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 37 | 20% |
Scientists | 27 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
United States | 3 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 1198 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 182 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 140 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 138 | 11% |
Researcher | 133 | 11% |
Other | 64 | 5% |
Other | 202 | 17% |
Unknown | 356 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 293 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 213 | 18% |
Psychology | 84 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 64 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 21 | 2% |
Other | 144 | 12% |
Unknown | 396 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 149. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#276,227
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#460
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,084
of 271,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.