↓ Skip to main content

Topical application of tranexamic acid for the reduction of bleeding

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
21 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
371 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Topical application of tranexamic acid for the reduction of bleeding
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010562.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katharine Ker, Deirdre Beecher, Ian Roberts

Abstract

Intravenous tranexamic acid reduces bleeding in surgery, however, its effect on the risk of thromboembolic events is uncertain and an increased risk remains a theoretical concern. Because there is less systemic absorption following topical administration, the direct application of tranexamic acid to the bleeding surface has the potential to reduce bleeding with minimal systemic effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 362 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 15%
Researcher 37 10%
Other 34 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 8%
Student > Bachelor 27 7%
Other 85 23%
Unknown 102 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 171 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 3%
Psychology 9 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 1%
Other 28 8%
Unknown 123 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,898,641
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,044
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,777
of 210,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#84
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.