You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Leukotriene inhibitors for bronchiolitis in infants and young children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010636.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fang Liu, Jing Ouyang, Atul N Sharma, Songqing Liu, Bo Yang, Wei Xiong, Rufu Xu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 20% |
| Austria | 1 | 7% |
| Colombia | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 163 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 20% |
| Unknown | 57 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 10% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 66 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,674,821
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,291
of 13,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,203
of 281,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#121
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.