You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cognitiveâbehavioural treatment for subacute and chronic neck pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010664 |
| Authors |
Marco Monticone, Christine Cedraschi, Barbara Rocca, Roberta Fiorentini, Maddalena Restelli, Silvia E Gianola, Simona Ferrante, Gustavo Zanoli, Lorenzo Moja, Monticone, Marco, Cedraschi, Christine, Rocca, Barbara, Fiorentini, Roberta, Restelli, Maddalena, Gianola, Silvia E, Ferrante, Simona, Zanoli, Gustavo, Moja, Lorenzo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 25% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 32% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 15% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2013.
All research outputs
#15,158,693
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,830
of 12,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,187
of 30,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.