You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Xylitol‐containing products for preventing dental caries in children and adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010743.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philip Riley, Deborah Moore, Farooq Ahmed, Mohammad O Sharif, Helen V Worthington |
| Abstract |
Dental caries is a highly prevalent chronic disease which affects the majority of people. It has been postulated that the consumption of xylitol could help to prevent caries. The evidence on the effects of xylitol products is not clear and therefore it is important to summarise the available evidence to determine its effectiveness and safety. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 292 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 60 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 5% |
| Spain | 11 | 4% |
| United States | 10 | 3% |
| Canada | 7 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 6 | 2% |
| Australia | 5 | 2% |
| Solomon Islands | 4 | 1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Unknown | 150 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 255 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 25 | 9% |
| Scientists | 8 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 484 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| El Salvador | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 480 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 70 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 68 | 14% |
| Researcher | 39 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 6% |
| Other | 77 | 16% |
| Unknown | 168 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 189 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 3% |
| Psychology | 12 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 50 | 10% |
| Unknown | 175 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 543. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#46,100
of 25,844,183 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#85
of 13,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#444
of 278,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,844,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.