↓ Skip to main content

Different infusion durations for preventing platinum‐induced hearing loss in children with cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Different infusion durations for preventing platinum‐induced hearing loss in children with cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010885.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jorrit W van As, Henk van den Berg, Elvira C van Dalen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 15%
Other 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 3%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 50 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 54 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,830,589
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,030
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,688
of 478,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#97
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.