You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Mobile phone‐based interventions for improving contraception use
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2015
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011159.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chris Smith, Judy Gold, Thoai D Ngo, Colin Sumpter, Caroline Free |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 4 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 25% |
United States | 2 | 17% |
India | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 504 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Romania | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 497 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 105 | 21% |
Researcher | 67 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 39 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 5% |
Other | 66 | 13% |
Unknown | 140 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 124 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 60 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 40 | 8% |
Psychology | 33 | 7% |
Computer Science | 16 | 3% |
Other | 75 | 15% |
Unknown | 156 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,872,909
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,988
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,800
of 281,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#86
of 290 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 290 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.