You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy versus non‐surgical management for obstructive sleep‐disordered breathing in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011165.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roderick P Venekamp, Benjamin J Hearne, Deepak Chandrasekharan, Helen Blackshaw, Jerome Lim, Anne GM Schilder |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| Colombia | 1 | 7% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 399 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 395 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 75 | 19% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 44 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 9% |
| Researcher | 33 | 8% |
| Other | 84 | 21% |
| Unknown | 91 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 175 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 8% |
| Psychology | 24 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 36 | 9% |
| Unknown | 109 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2022.
All research outputs
#741,794
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,373
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,860
of 293,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 298 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 298 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.