↓ Skip to main content

interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients (updated protocol)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
457 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients (updated protocol)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011236.pub2
Authors

Peter Davey, Claire L Scott, Erwin Brown, Esmita Charani, Susan Michie, Craig R Ramsay, Charis A Marwick

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 457 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 450 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 84 18%
Researcher 53 12%
Student > Bachelor 39 9%
Student > Postgraduate 36 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 8%
Other 127 28%
Unknown 82 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 169 37%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 47 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 4%
Unspecified 16 4%
Other 76 17%
Unknown 97 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,455,835
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,935
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,064
of 328,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#162
of 290 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 290 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.