You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effects of peri‐operative nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs on post‐operative kidney function for adults with normal kidney function
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2018
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011274.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Samira Bell, Trijntje Rennie, Charis A Marwick, Peter Davey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 21% |
Spain | 3 | 13% |
United States | 2 | 8% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
Martinique | 1 | 4% |
Mexico | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 75% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 184 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 26 | 14% |
Student > Master | 21 | 11% |
Researcher | 8 | 4% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 4% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 4% |
Other | 30 | 16% |
Unknown | 84 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
Psychology | 5 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 6% |
Unknown | 90 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,717,027
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,684
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,349
of 446,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#85
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.