↓ Skip to main content

Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non‐specific low back pain: prognostic factor review

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
124 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
426 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non‐specific low back pain: prognostic factor review
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011284.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jill A Hayden, Maria N Wilson, Richard D Riley, Ross Iles, Tamar Pincus, Rachel Ogilvie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 124 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 426 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 425 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 13%
Student > Bachelor 48 11%
Researcher 32 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 7%
Other 23 5%
Other 63 15%
Unknown 175 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 58 14%
Psychology 15 4%
Sports and Recreations 13 3%
Social Sciences 11 3%
Other 45 11%
Unknown 193 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#475,853
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#842
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,276
of 478,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.