You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
External drains versus no drains after burr‐hole evacuation for the treatment of chronic subdural haematoma in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011402.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deqing Peng, Yongjian Zhu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Guatemala | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 149 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 16% |
| Researcher | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 49 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 61 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2019.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,649
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,035
of 351,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#233
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.