↓ Skip to main content

Robot‐assisted surgery in gynaecology

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Robot‐assisted surgery in gynaecology
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011422
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hongqian Liu, Theresa A Lawrie, DongHao Lu, Huan Song, Lei Wang, Gang Shi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 110 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 16%
Researcher 15 14%
Other 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 16 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Engineering 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 22 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,675,106
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,563
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,977
of 370,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#85
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.