You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ultrasound versus liver function tests for diagnosis of common bile duct stones
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011548 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Vanja Giljaca, Yemisi Takwoingi, David Higgie, Goran Poropat, Davor Štimac, Brian R Davidson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 258 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 11% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Researcher | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 9% |
| Other | 42 | 16% |
| Unknown | 83 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 114 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Unknown | 97 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,930,034
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,722
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,450
of 270,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#194
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.