You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chewing gum for enhancing early recovery of bowel function after caesarean section
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011562.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edna Pereira Gomes Morais, Rachel Riera, Gustavo JM Porfírio, Cristiane R Macedo, Vivian Sarmento Vasconcelos, Alexsandra de Souza Pedrosa, Maria R Torloni |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 21% |
| Japan | 4 | 10% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 26% |
| Scientists | 4 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 296 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 10% |
| Researcher | 25 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 58 | 20% |
| Unknown | 87 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 3% |
| Psychology | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 8% |
| Unknown | 96 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#400,283
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#693
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,596
of 323,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.