↓ Skip to main content

Antiseptics for burns

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
31 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
574 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antiseptics for burns
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011821.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gill Norman, Janice Christie, Zhenmi Liu, Maggie J Westby, Jayne M Jefferies, Thomas Hudson, Jacky Edwards, Devi Prasad Mohapatra, Ibrahim A Hassan, Jo C Dumville

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 574 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 574 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 82 14%
Student > Master 63 11%
Researcher 45 8%
Student > Postgraduate 38 7%
Other 31 5%
Other 113 20%
Unknown 202 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 154 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 66 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 25 4%
Unspecified 20 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 2%
Other 74 13%
Unknown 223 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,268,816
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,667
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,903
of 325,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#83
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.