You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions for obtaining and maintaining employment in adults with severe mental illness, a network meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011867 |
| Authors |
Yvonne B Suijkerbuijk, Jos H Verbeek, Joost van Mechelen, Anneli Ojajärvi, Johannes R Anema, Marc Corbiere, Frederieke G Schaafsma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 33% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 24% |
| Unknown | 5 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 12 | 24% |
| Psychology | 10 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2016.
All research outputs
#13,447,737
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,086
of 12,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,309
of 267,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#233
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.