↓ Skip to main content

Intravesical bacillus Calmette‐Guérin versus mitomycin C for Ta and T1 bladder cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intravesical bacillus Calmette‐Guérin versus mitomycin C for Ta and T1 bladder cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011935
Authors

Stefanie Schmidt, Frank Kunath, Bernadette Coles, Desiree Louise Draeger, Laura‐Maria Krabbe, Rick Dersch, Katrin Jensen, Philipp Dahm, Joerg J Meerpohl

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 32%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Psychology 2 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2019.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,431
of 297,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#236
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.