You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intravesical Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin versus mitomycin C for Ta and T1 bladder cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011935.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefanie Schmidt, Frank Kunath, Bernadette Coles, Desiree Louise Draeger, Laura-Maria Krabbe, Rick Dersch, Samuel Kilian, Katrin Jensen, Philipp Dahm, Joerg J Meerpohl |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| Colombia | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 201 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 8% |
| Researcher | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 13% |
| Unknown | 91 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 9% |
| Unknown | 106 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,216,860
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,934
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,849
of 476,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#87
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.