You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Healthcare workers’ perceptions and experience on using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: qualitative evidence synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011942 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Willem Odendaal, Jane Goudge, Frances Griffiths, Mark Tomlinson, Natalie Leon, Karen Daniels |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 15% |
| South Africa | 2 | 8% |
| India | 2 | 8% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 62% |
| Scientists | 6 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 132 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 25% |
| Researcher | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Psychology | 9 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#724,479
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,348
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,786
of 294,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 296 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 296 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.