You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Interventions to increase attendance for diabetic retinopathy screening
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012054 |
Authors |
John G Lawrenson, Ella Graham‐Rowe, Fabiana Lorencatto, Justin Presseau, Jennifer Burr, Noah Ivers, Ana Quartilho, Catey Bunce, Jillian J Francis, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Tunde Peto, Stephen Rice, Luke Vale |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
Australia | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 11% |
Researcher | 5 | 11% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Other | 9 | 20% |
Unknown | 7 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 35% |
Psychology | 5 | 11% |
Computer Science | 3 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 15% |
Unknown | 11 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,982,712
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,110
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,748
of 407,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#219
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.