↓ Skip to main content

Hydroxyurea (hydroxycarbamide) for transfusion‐dependent β‐thalassaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hydroxyurea (hydroxycarbamide) for transfusion‐dependent β‐thalassaemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012064.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saqib H Ansari, Zohra S Lassi, Salima M Khowaja, Syed Omair Adil, Tahir S Shamsi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Researcher 8 6%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 57 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 61 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,572,011
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,396
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,373
of 365,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#139
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.