↓ Skip to main content

Virtual reality environments for health professional education

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Virtual reality environments for health professional education
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012090
Authors

Nakul Saxena, Bhone M Kyaw, Jitka Vseteckova, Parvati Dev, Pradeep Paul, Kenneth Teck Kiat Lim, Andrzej Kononowicz, Italo Masiello, Lorainne Tudor Car, Charoula K Nikolaou, Nabil Zary, Josip Car

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 64 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 17 26%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 29%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Psychology 6 9%
Computer Science 5 8%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 17 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,741,269
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,928
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,919
of 312,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#157
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.