You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Education of family members to support weaning to solids and nutrition in later infancy in term‐born infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012241.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shalini Ojha, Zenab Elfzzani, T'ng Chang Kwok, Jon Dorling |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 21% |
| Japan | 2 | 7% |
| Colombia | 2 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 25% |
| Scientists | 3 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 321 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 7% |
| Researcher | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 52 | 16% |
| Unknown | 152 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 47 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 15 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Psychology | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 9% |
| Unknown | 164 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,102,154
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,436
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,710
of 428,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#77
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.