You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Environmental interventions to reduce the consumption of sugar‐sweetened beverages and their effects on health
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2016
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012292 |
Authors |
Peter von Philipsborn, Jan M Stratil, Jacob Burns, Laura K Busert, Lisa M Pfadenhauer, Stephanie Polus, Christina Holzapfel, Hans Hauner, Eva Rehfuess |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 2 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
Germany | 2 | 17% |
Australia | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 50% |
Members of the public | 4 | 33% |
Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 122 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 16% |
Researcher | 17 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
Other | 20 | 16% |
Unknown | 28 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 31% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
Psychology | 6 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 12% |
Unknown | 31 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,114,206
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,256
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,090
of 387,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.