↓ Skip to main content

Treatments for preventing recurrence of infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatments for preventing recurrence of infection with <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> in people with cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012300.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sally Palser, Sherie Smith, Edward F Nash, Arnav Agarwal, Alan R Smyth

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 169 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Other 11 7%
Researcher 9 5%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 81 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Psychology 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 87 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2020.
All research outputs
#5,324,727
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,466
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,354
of 463,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.