You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Conservative interventions for treating functional daytime urinary incontinence in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012367.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian S Buckley, Caroline D Sanders, Loukia Spineli, Qiaoling Deng, Joey SW Kwong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 27% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 360 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 9% |
| Researcher | 30 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 68 | 19% |
| Unknown | 132 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 53 | 15% |
| Psychology | 16 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 55 | 15% |
| Unknown | 148 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,771,203
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,799
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,473
of 354,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.