You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Botulinum toxin for drooling in Parkinson’s disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012408 |
| Authors |
Fiona Hill, Nick Miller, Richard A Walsh, David Mockler, Ronald McDowell, Margaret Walshe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 7 | 58% |
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 26% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 10% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,311,143
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,608
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,610
of 320,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#140
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.