You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions for treating wrist fractures in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012470.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen HG Handoll, Joanne Elliott, Zipporah Iheozor‐Ejiofor, James Hunter, Alexia Karantana |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 24% |
| United States | 3 | 14% |
| Spain | 2 | 10% |
| Germany | 2 | 10% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Guinea | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 48% |
| Scientists | 5 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 419 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 418 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 11% |
| Researcher | 43 | 10% |
| Other | 27 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 70 | 17% |
| Unknown | 156 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 126 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 10% |
| Psychology | 12 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 46 | 11% |
| Unknown | 176 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,227,970
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,559
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,479
of 447,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.