↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for promoting participation in shared decision‐making for children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
332 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for promoting participation in shared decision‐making for children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012578.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen Malone, Susan Biggar, Sheila Javadpour, Zai Edworthy, Greg Sheaf, Imelda Coyne

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 332 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 14%
Student > Bachelor 31 9%
Researcher 29 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 7%
Other 13 4%
Other 54 16%
Unknown 136 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 14%
Psychology 28 8%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Other 35 11%
Unknown 146 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2022.
All research outputs
#5,331,298
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,661
of 13,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,802
of 364,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#124
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.