You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dialysate temperature reduction for intradialytic hypotension for people with chronic kidney disease requiring haemodialysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012598 |
| Authors |
Yasushi Tsujimoto, Hiraku Tsujimoto, Yukihiko Nakata, Yuki Kataoka, Miho Kimachi, Sayaka Shimizu, Tatsuyoshi Ikenoue, Shingo Fukuma, Yamamoto Yosuke, Shunichi Fukuhara |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2017.
All research outputs
#20,014,336
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,254
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,763
of 322,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#216
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.