You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Indoor residual spraying for preventing malaria in communities using insecticide‐treated nets
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012688.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leslie Choi<sup>a</sup>, Joseph Pryce<sup>a</sup>, Paul Garner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 35% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Scientists | 3 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 231 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 10% |
| Unknown | 68 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 39 | 17% |
| Unknown | 79 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,872,667
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,636
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,299
of 364,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.