You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stem cell therapy for treatment of thromboangiitis obliterans (Buerger's disease)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012794.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel G Cacione, Frederico do Carmo Novaes, Daniel H Moreno |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 167 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 13% |
| Researcher | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 17% |
| Unknown | 57 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 67 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,786,253
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,503
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,795
of 364,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.