You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions to increase patient and family involvement in escalation of care for acute life‐threatening illness in community health and hospital settings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012829 |
| Authors |
Nicola J Mackintosh, Rachel E Davis, Abigail Easter, Hannah Rayment‐Jones, Nick Sevdalis, Sophie Wilson, Mary Adams, Jane Sandall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 35% |
| United States | 4 | 15% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| Australia | 2 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 42% |
| Scientists | 9 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 14% |
| Psychology | 11 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2018.
All research outputs
#2,658,442
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,303
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,413
of 335,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#128
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.