↓ Skip to main content

Screening hysteroscopy in subfertile women and women undergoing assisted reproduction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Screening hysteroscopy in subfertile women and women undergoing assisted reproduction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012856.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohan S Kamath, Jan Bosteels, Thomas M D'Hooghe, Srividya Seshadri, Steven Weyers, Ben Willem J Mol, Frank J Broekmans, Sesh Kamal Sunkara

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 165 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Other 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 34 21%
Unknown 60 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Unspecified 5 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 68 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2019.
All research outputs
#6,967,297
of 25,481,734 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,582
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,656
of 348,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#141
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,481,734 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.