You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Non‐nutritive sweeteners for diabetes mellitus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012885 |
| Authors |
Szimonetta Lohner, Ingrid Toews, Daniela Kuellenberg de Gaudry, Harriet Sommer, Joerg J Meerpohl |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 19% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2020.
All research outputs
#4,858,208
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,048
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,103
of 447,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#132
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.